Explore Korean medicine.
Start with the evidence.

Where to go, what to understand, and what the research says.
Explore institutions, public statistics and treatment evidence.

Find a provider by name

Search by registered name, short name or address, or browse the complete index. Each provider page identifies its sources and research coverage.

All 129 provider names and addresses → · Gangdong public directory →

Choose a suitable clinic by comparing the evidence

Hanui Index helps you find candidates for your care needs and practical preferences, with documented reasons to compare them. Select a location and service, then review clinicians, hours and source-specific patient feedback.

  1. Care needs: check whether the individual branch describes the service you seek.
  2. Clinicians: review names, biographies and explicitly stated gender information, then confirm appointment availability.
  3. Practical fit: compare location and hours; confirm costs, insurance eligibility and the proposed plan in consultation.
  4. Review evidence: examine ratings and collection coverage separately by platform, and consider recurring experience themes.

Recommendations help narrow consultation candidates. Documentation coverage is distinct from treatment outcomes, and unknown information remains explicit.

Compare candidates for your needs →
Korean medicine clinics
14,738
2024 · Ministry of Health and Welfare
Korean medicine hospitals
582
2024 · Counted separately from clinics
Ever used Korean medicine
67.3%
2024 survey · Adults 19+ · Lifetime use
Institutions in this index
129
17 regions · Websites checked Sep 2026

Explore the directory

University hospitals and care networks

View all 129 →

University-affiliated KM hospitals

Selected examples

Kyung Hee University Korean Medicine Hospital

Seoul · KM hospital · University affiliated

Pusan National University Korean Medicine Hospital

Gyeongnam · KM hospital · University affiliated

Sangji University Korean Medicine Hospital

Gangwon · KM hospital · University affiliated

Inclusion and display order do not indicate a recommendation or outcomes.

A regional perspective

2024 clinics + hospitals · Five largest regional counts

All statistics →
Institution counts describe supply, not quality of care.
MOHW public dataset ↗

Research, with context

Read the findings alongside the comparator and uncertainty.

Explore 8 studies →
2018 · Individual-patient-data meta-analysis
Benefits observed · comparator matters

Acupuncture for chronic pain

Between-group differences were about 0.5 standard deviations versus no acupuncture and 0.2 versus sham. The comparator affects the apparent size of the benefit.

2021 · Multicenter randomized controlled trial
Benefit observed in one clinical trial

Chuna for chronic neck pain

At 5 weeks, the difference in pain improvement favored Chuna by 16.8 mm on a 100-mm scale (95% CI 10.1–23.5).

2020 · Systematic review
Effect size and certainty are limited

Acupuncture for chronic nonspecific low back pain

Versus usual care, the immediate pain difference was about 10.3 points on a 100-point scale, which the review judged not clinically important.

What should you look for in a provider?

Start with clinician credentials, relevant care, clear explanations and referral pathways.

Read the selection guide →

The use statistic measures any lifetime use, not annual use, satisfaction or treatment success. 2024 Korean Medicine Utilization Survey ↗